How the funding crisis endangers AU's operations in Somalia
African Union soldiers patrolling in Somalia's urban landscape.

The future of the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) hangs in the balance as funding uncertainties and geopolitical tensions threaten its operations.

With troop payments delayed and a new mission structure on the horizon, the situation calls for urgent attention from the international community.

Key Takeaways

  • Funding for the African Union Support and Stabilization Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM) is uncertain due to delays in a UN cost-sharing mechanism.
  • Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is advocating for a leadership role in the mission’s next phase, seeking to exclude Ethiopian troops.
  • The U.S. and other allies support the new mission structure, but the UN Security Council has raised concerns about its implementation.

Funding Challenges for AUSSOM

The AUSSOM, which is set to replace ATMIS in January 2025, faces significant financial hurdles. The mission was expected to benefit from a structured funding model under UN Security Council Resolution 2719, which aimed to cover 75% of its costs through UN-assessed contributions.

However, the immediate application of this resolution has been deferred, leaving the mission’s financial sustainability in jeopardy.

  • Current Funding Model:
    • UN Contributions: 75%
    • African Union Contributions: 25%

Without timely disbursement of funds, AUSSOM’s effectiveness in combating Al-Shabaab insurgents and stabilizing Somalia is at risk. The UN Secretary-General has called for predictable funding, emphasizing the need for the Security Council to act swiftly.

Political Dynamics and Military Composition

The political landscape surrounding the mission is complex. President Mohamud has been actively engaging with troop-contributing countries, emphasizing Somalia’s desire for control over the mission’s next phase. Notably, he has sought to exclude Ethiopian troops, which Somalia views as a threat to its sovereignty.

  • Troop Composition Issues:
    • Countries Transitioning Forces: Most ATMIS contributors
    • Burundi: Opted out due to concerns over troop allocation
    • Egypt: Interested in joining as a new contributor

The ongoing tensions with Ethiopia, particularly following its agreement with Somaliland over Red Sea access, have further complicated the situation. Somalia has signed defense pacts with Egypt and Turkey to bolster its security.

International Response and Future Outlook

The international community remains divided on the future of AUSSOM. While the U.S. and some allies support the new mission structure, the UN Security Council has expressed concerns about the funding mechanism and troop composition.

The U.S. has been hesitant to commit to the funding model, citing unmet conditions for the transition of funds.

  • Key Concerns:
    • U.S. Position: Reluctance to fund AUSSOM under the current resolution
    • Funding Delays: Risk of operational inefficiencies and security vacuums

As the AU and UN work to secure alternative funding sources, the situation remains precarious. The AU is currently applying the ATMIS funding model to cover troop allowances until at least July 2025, but the source of these funds remains uncertain.

In conclusion, the future of the African Union mission in Somalia is at a critical juncture. The interplay of funding uncertainties, political dynamics, and international support will significantly influence Somalia’s stability and the effectiveness of foreign military assistance in the region.

Author

  • Ericson Mangoli

    Ericson Mangoli is the founder and Managing Editor of Who Owns Africa, a platform for African journalism that focuses on politics, governance, business and entrepreneurs who are changing perspectives of the African continent.

    View all posts

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *