South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has initiated a judicial inquiry to investigate allegations that previous African National Congress (ANC) governments obstructed the investigation and prosecution of crimes committed during the apartheid era.
This move comes in response to growing criticism from families of victims who have long sought justice for the atrocities of the past.
Key Takeaways
- President Cyril Ramaphosa has announced an inquiry into claims of interference in apartheid-era crime investigations.
- The inquiry follows a lawsuit from 25 families of victims, including those of the notorious Cradock Four.
- The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) previously identified numerous cases but few have led to prosecutions.
- The inquiry aims to uncover the truth and provide closure for the families affected by apartheid violence.
Background of the Inquiry
The inquiry was prompted by a lawsuit filed in January by a group of 25 relatives and survivors of apartheid-era violence.
They allege that interference from high-ranking officials within the ANC has hindered the investigation of cases referred to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) by the TRC.
The TRC, established in 1996, was tasked with uncovering the truth about human rights violations during apartheid.
It documented numerous cases of murder, torture, and other crimes, yet many of these cases have not progressed to trial, leading to frustration among victims’ families.
The Cradock Four Case
Among the families involved in the lawsuit are those of the Cradock Four, a group of anti-apartheid activists who were brutally murdered by security forces in 1985.
The TRC denied amnesty to six security officers involved in their deaths, yet no prosecutions have occurred, and the officers are now deceased.
Lukhanyo Calata, son of one of the Cradock Four, expressed hope that the inquiry would shed light on the alleged interference and bring justice to the families. He stated, “Their dark and dastardly deeds must be brought into light.
This is yet another crucial step to help the long-suffering families on their journey towards truth, justice, and closure.”
Government’s Response
In a statement, the presidency acknowledged the persistent allegations of improper influence in delaying the investigation and prosecution of apartheid-era crimes.
Ramaphosa is committed to establishing the truth and bringing closure to the families affected by these historical injustices.
The inquiry will be led by a yet-to-be-announced figure, with details regarding its timetable and terms of reference forthcoming.
The government has indicated that it will seek a stay of application on the outstanding matters related to the families’ lawsuit pending the inquiry’s outcomes.
Criticism and Concerns
While the establishment of the inquiry has been welcomed by some, it has also faced criticism. The Foundation for Human Rights (FHR), representing the victims, expressed disappointment that the inquiry would not have the authority to address claims for constitutional damages, which the families are seeking through their lawsuit.
The FHR emphasized that only a court can determine such matters, and they fear that the inquiry may prolong the suffering of the families without providing the justice they seek.
Conclusion
As South Africa grapples with its apartheid legacy, this inquiry represents a significant step towards accountability and justice for victims of past atrocities.
President Ramaphosa’s commitment to uncovering the truth may help heal the wounds of a nation still affected by the scars of its history.
The outcome of this inquiry will be closely watched by both victims’ families and the broader South African society as they seek closure and justice for the crimes of the past.
