Why Safaricom wants Starlink out of Kenya

Safaricom, the leading telecommunications company in Kenya, has found itself in a fierce battle with billionaire Elon Musk’s Starlink over the satellite internet market in the country.

The clash came to light when Safaricom raised concerns to the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) about the decision to grant licenses to independent satellite internet providers, specifically targeting Starlink.

This move by Safaricom has sparked a heated debate within the telecommunications industry in Kenya.

One of the key reasons behind Safaricom’s push to keep Starlink out of Kenya is the fear of losing its existing customer base to the American firm’s competitive pricing and innovative services.

Since Starlink made its entry into the Kenyan market in July last year, there has been a noticeable surge in the number of Kenyans opting for satellite internet services.

With Elon Musk’s reputation as one of the wealthiest individuals globally and his commitment to providing affordable internet access, Starlink has quickly gained traction among consumers in Kenya.

By offering attractive promotions and affordable monthly plans, Starlink has disrupted the internet service market, creating a competitive environment for established players like Safaricom, Jamii Telecommunications Limited (JTL), and Zuku.

Safaricom, being the dominant player in the telecommunications sector in Kenya, sees Starlink as a significant threat that could potentially erode its market share and revenue.

In its memo to the CA, Safaricom raised concerns about the potential risks associated with allowing satellite internet providers to operate without establishing agreements with local companies.

The telco proposed that satellite service providers should only be allowed to operate in Kenya if they form partnerships with existing local licensees.

This suggestion is aimed at safeguarding the interests of local telecommunications companies and preventing illegal connections and harmful interference to mobile networks.

Safaricom’s stance reflects its determination to protect its market position and revenue streams from external competitors like Starlink.

Safaricom’s concern about the regulation of satellite service providers operating without a physical local presence was clear in their statement.

They emphasized the importance of these providers operating under the license rights of a local licensee to ensure effective government oversight.

The CA did not provide an immediate response to Safaricom’s comments, leaving the issue unresolved.

The growing popularity of Starlink, which launched in 2023, has disrupted the market with its innovative approach to distributing hardware and connecting users through third parties and resellers.

Safaricom, a dominant player in the data market with a significant market share, highlighted the impact of Starlink’s competitive pricing strategies in attracting a growing user base.

Starlink’s introduction of more affordable monthly plans and rental options further expanded its reach and challenged local providers to step up their game to retain customers.

As Safaricom considers venturing into the satellite internet service sector, the discussions around regulating foreign entities operating in Kenya without a physical presence intensify.

Safaricom’s stance on the importance of accountability for non-compliance issues resonated with concerns about granting licenses to entities that may not be easily regulated by the Kenyan government.

Starlink’s silence in response to these concerns raises questions about how the satellite internet market will continue to evolve in Kenya and how local players like Safaricom will navigate this changing landscape.

By urging the CA to reconsider the licensing decision, Safaricom is advocating for a regulatory framework that ensures a level playing field for all players in the telecommunications industry.

The telco’s call for stringent regulations on satellite internet providers highlights the growing importance of satellite technology in expanding internet access and connectivity in Kenya.

As the battle between Safaricom and Starlink unfolds, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the telecommunications landscape in Kenya.

While Safaricom seeks to maintain its dominance in the market, Starlink’s disruptive presence offers the promise of lower internet costs and enhanced connectivity for consumers.

Ultimately, the clash between these two titans underscores the evolving nature of the telecommunications sector and the need for regulatory clarity to foster healthy competition and innovation.

Go to Who Owns Africa for more news from the African continent.

Follow Who Owns Africa on Twitter @Who Owns Africa, on Facebook at Who Owns Africa or on Instagram at whoownsafrica.